Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorrect IfcSlab placements #216

Open
ptlprg opened this issue Jul 16, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Incorrect IfcSlab placements #216

ptlprg opened this issue Jul 16, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@ptlprg
Copy link

ptlprg commented Jul 16, 2021

Hi,

The viewer does not correctly place 2 IfcSlab elements from the following zipped IFC file (UIDs '0rgbeO1PHAtAAseSmGoQAq' and '0rgbeO1PHAtAAseSmGoQ1M'): test.zip

image

Expected placement:
image

Thanks!

@ifcquery
Copy link
Owner

There are many geometric issues with this file, but the slab with GUID "0rgbeO1PHAtAAseSmGoQAq" is in the correct position.
2021-07-19 17_57_35-IQ-IFC - Microsoft Visual Studio

@ptlprg
Copy link
Author

ptlprg commented Jul 19, 2021

Hi,

Thanks for the reply!

Each import seems to behave differently. This time, I had #148057 (IFCSLAB '3IucpERVDEbvOIw6JlumH7') at the wrong place.
image
(The roof is gone too but my app doesn't really care about them. ;) )

Do you think the geometric issues are causing the wrong placements? Could this be improved by tuning some precision settings?

@ptlprg
Copy link
Author

ptlprg commented Jul 19, 2021

Btw, I'm using the viewer from ifcquery.com for these tests (haven't compiled it myself).

But I'm seeing similar issues importing this specific file in my own app (which is based on ifcplusplus).

@ptlprg
Copy link
Author

ptlprg commented Sep 16, 2021

Hi,

Just a friendly reminder of these placement issues, which do not happen in BIMvision.

Could we expect a fix?

Thanks a lot for you work on this great project!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants