Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better Naming #2

Open
jeffturcotte opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Better Naming #2

jeffturcotte opened this issue Nov 7, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@jeffturcotte
Copy link
Member

jeffturcotte commented Nov 7, 2017

vuexModule, vueMixin, etc. are too generic IMO. I don't know for sure what would be better, but here are some suggestions:

ClockvineStore (capitalized as it is a class)
clockvineModel
clockvineEditableModel

@khamer
Copy link
Member

khamer commented Nov 10, 2017

I agree – I'm going to make 0.4 or 0.5 break backwards compatibility, and I'll do something like this then.

@khamer
Copy link
Member

khamer commented Jan 21, 2022

So, I did change the names, but didn't namespace them. It seems to me like

import { CollectionComponent } from 'clockvine-vue'

Is reasonable and consistent. If anything, I think I should try to publish as just 'clockvine'.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants