Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Identification & sex: pull through object hierarchy? #122

Open
Eveltjen00 opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 7 comments
Open

Identification & sex: pull through object hierarchy? #122

Eveltjen00 opened this issue May 24, 2024 · 7 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member

Have the option to bring the identification of the sampling point and its objects to it's parents and children in the hierarchy?
For example
vuursalamander -> tissue vuursalamander -> DNA vuursalamander

Maar opgelet
boom -> hybride child van boom X

Maybe use a checkbox: link taxonomy with parent/child? Uit te zoeken

@Eveltjen00 Eveltjen00 changed the title Identification: pull through object hierarchy? Identification & sex: pull through object hierarchy? May 24, 2024
@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

Same issue with sex: it might be relevant to see this in all the child-records of the sampling point. Can this be pulled through?

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

Eveltjen00 commented May 31, 2024

image

Same issue with genotype and with identification. All "characteristics" and properties.
Maybe have it the other way around: automatically have it linked, and action necessary to unlink it for the case of parent-child relationships that come forth of sexual reproduction.

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

Similarily, it would be interesting to be able to push through the taxon of a plantation to all of its objects.

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

Similar to #78

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

This is related to comment: #105
The sampling date of the first sampling point -> object, should be fixed for all subsequent objects created.

@Eveltjen00
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe instead of prepopulate work more with the code?
For example

ca_places.parent.preferred_labels.name
<unit relativeTo="ca_list_items.hierarchy"><p>^ca_list_items.preferred_labels.name_plural (ca_list_items.idno)</p></unit>
Object is ^ca_objects.preferred_labels.name;
Entities are: <unit relativeTo="ca_entities">^ca_entities.preferred_labels.displayname
(Birthplace: <unit relativeTo="ca_places">^ca_places.preferred_labels.name</unit></unit>
relativeTo='ca_objects.parent'
The descendant modifier returns all records below a given record. The branch modifier is similar to descendants but includes the given record along with its descendants.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant