Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Option to include modeling object as a returned statistic in ARD? #24

Open
ddsjoberg opened this issue Aug 7, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Comments

@ddsjoberg
Copy link
Collaborator

Feature description

for functions like ard_regression(), ard_ttest(), etc., should we include an argument to return the ARD with a row for the model object.

  • PRO: for regression models, users have access to the object needed to make additional calculations as needed.
    • an aside, need to consider how we can add additional results to the regression modeling object. Thee broom::glance() is a simple default (and easy to make extendable by users). Even if we did add this, how can we distinguish these results from other regression model objects that may appear in the same stacked ARD.
  • CON: a modelling object is not something that is generic/readable by other languages, so we need a direct use case before adding it
@ddsjoberg ddsjoberg transferred this issue from insightsengineering/cards Feb 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant