Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

duckdb? #401

Open
ll4strw opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

duckdb? #401

ll4strw opened this issue Jan 13, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Milestone
0.6.0

Comments

@ll4strw
Copy link
Contributor

ll4strw commented Jan 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

I realize the following could be seen as an unconventional employment of duckdb, but would its use to read an validate the server json conf offer any advantages over the current method?
Duckdb could also be used to read/analyze json response from oidc servers.
Moreover, it could replace irods::process_stash.
Just wondering if this made any sense, especially if the conf file grew in complexity.
Thanks in advance.
@trel
Copy link
Member

trel commented Jan 13, 2025

similar investigation as #398

@trel trel added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 13, 2025
@korydraughn korydraughn added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Jan 13, 2025
@korydraughn korydraughn added the question Further information is requested label Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.6.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@trel @korydraughn @ll4strw