Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
73 lines (47 loc) · 3.39 KB

smooth_traj.md

File metadata and controls

73 lines (47 loc) · 3.39 KB

Smooth trajectories for robot motion

Here's a breakdown of approaches to achieve smooth motion with ROS 2's geometry_msgs/msg/Twist commands, catering to your scenario of starting and ending at specific positions with defined headings. We'll progress from simpler to more involved techniques:

1. Basic Proportional Control (Easiest)

Core Idea: Adjust linear and angular velocities proportionally to the errors in position and orientation.

Implementation:

  • Calculate errors: delta_x, delta_y, delta_theta (difference between current and target values)
  • Set velocities:
    • twist.linear.x = k_p_linear * delta_x (move faster if further from goal)
    • twist.angular.z = k_p_angular * delta_theta (turn faster if misaligned)
  • Cap velocities: Ensure they stay within robot's limits.

Pros: Simple to implement, decent for basic scenarios

Cons: Can lead to overshoot/oscillations, not ideal for precise final pose

2. Ramped Velocity Profiles

Core Idea: Gradually increase/decrease velocities to avoid abrupt starts/stops.

Implementation:

  • Apply basic proportional control.
  • Add ramping logic:
  • If accelerating, increase velocity by a small amount each timestep until desired velocity is reached.
  • If decelerating, decrease velocity similarly.

Pros: Smoother motion, less stress on motors

Cons: Still can have some overshoot, tuning ramp rates can be tricky

3. PID Control

Core Idea: Use a PID controller (Proportional-Integral-Derivative) to precisely track the desired trajectory.

Implementation:

  • Calculate errors as before.
  • PID controller outputs:
    • linear_vel_cmd = Kp_linear * delta_x + Ki_linear * integral_x_error + Kd_linear * derivative_x_error
    • angular_vel_cmd = ... Similar PID calculation for angular error
  • Update integral and derivative errors in each timestep.
  • Set twist velocities based on PID outputs, capping as needed.

Pros: Excellent control, minimizes overshoot, handles varying conditions

Cons: More complex to implement and tune, requires understanding of PID

4. Trajectory Generation and Tracking (Most Advanced)

Core Idea: Plan a smooth trajectory in space and time, then track it using a controller.

Implementation:

  • Use a trajectory generation algorithm (e.g., splines, Bézier curves) to create a path from start to goal, considering smoothness and robot constraints.
  • In each timestep, calculate the desired position and velocity from the trajectory.
  • Use a controller (e.g., PID) to track the desired trajectory.

Pros: Highest level of control, can generate complex, optimized paths

Cons: Most complex to implement, requires trajectory planning algorithms

Choosing the Right Approach

For simple movements and less stringent accuracy requirements, basic proportional control or ramped velocity profiles might suffice. If precise positioning and orientation at the goal are crucial, PID control or trajectory generation/tracking would be more suitable.

Additional Notes

Consider using ROS 2's nav2_controller package, which provides implementations of various controllers (including DWB) that you can leverage. Tuning the controller gains (k_p, k_i, k_d) is crucial for achieving good performance. Experimentation and iterative refinement will be necessary. Feel free to ask if you'd like more details on a specific approach or need help implementing it in your ROS 2 project!