You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
as i konw the offset should be pixel-level shifts for each pixel of x-axis,but what puzzles me is the meaning of ops "* width_f" back in the formula above.
could you explain it for any spare time ? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The way we are using it for every scale: bilinear_sampler_1d_h(img, -disp) note that disp is not the offset disparity. It actually is offset disparity divided by the width of that in that scale to make it between 0-1.
That being said, to convert it to the normal offset pixel shifting known, you will need to multiply by the width.
Strike the key point! Thanks for answering my question.
disp=0.54*tf.multiply(focal_length,invDepth)
Like you said before the disp is the normalized disparity.The baseline and depth should be in meters.
On the other side,the focal length should be in pixel_length,so i infer the disp should be the pixel shifts too.
as i konw the offset should be pixel-level shifts for each pixel of x-axis,but what puzzles me is the meaning of ops "* width_f" back in the formula above.
could you explain it for any spare time ? :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: