Was the types line in package.json reverted on purpose?

[hapablap21]

It was there in 2.2.1 but is now gone in 2.3.0

[oakeef]

reading this Pull Request it appears that they were the wrong types?
And then accroding to this reply in a different issue. The types are provided here
They are 2 years old though, so I'm not sure if they are the same types that were removed or not

[capaj]

yes they were wrong.
If you think you are able to fix them, I think @jkdrangel would gladly accept a PR to do that.
When I did a PR for removal of types I did not have time to fix the types. I had like 10 minutes, so I just forked it, opened the PR and forgot about it.