You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of pre-allocating a fixed number of pointers, we can take M.M.Michael's suggestion to allocate new pointers only when the total number of threads that coexisted at any point in time increases.
Can we also de-allocate pointers in a lock-free manner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
jleben
changed the title
Hazard pointers: Allocate number of pointer proportional to number of threads
Hazard pointers: Allocate number of pointers proportional to number of threads
Apr 13, 2018
Instead of pre-allocating a fixed number of pointers, we can take M.M.Michael's suggestion to allocate new pointers only when the total number of threads that coexisted at any point in time increases.
Can we also de-allocate pointers in a lock-free manner?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: