We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There exist other tools using the @ syntax such as jsdoc.
So far I haven't had any problem mixing the two, but it seems a bit risky to mix them anyway.
Is there a way to manage this situation? Could it be possible to support overriding the directive symbol to ensure compatibility?
For instance configuring preprocess to use a # instead of @ would solve the problem for people already using jsdoc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There exist other tools using the @ syntax such as jsdoc.
So far I haven't had any problem mixing the two, but it seems a bit risky to mix them anyway.
Is there a way to manage this situation? Could it be possible to support overriding the directive symbol to ensure compatibility?
For instance configuring preprocess to use a # instead of @ would solve the problem for people already using jsdoc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: