You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Yes, there should be a common, useful Lumino Widget for threaded discussion topics, generic over a few axes, such as:
specific widget
some number of providers of
identity
storage
So we would have:
Discussion<Notebook, PullRequestsManager>
Discussion<Editor, PullRequestsManager>
Discussion<PullRequest, PullRequestsManager>
But for playing at home, and just storing stuff in notebook metadata, one might have:
Discussion<Notebook, NotebookMetadataManager>
here, the data model should likely be the Web Annotation Data Model, or more likely, some concrete realization of it as a JSON schema, as would be most consumable by other systems, some day (e.g. hypothes.is)
the big challenge is the selector for which there is not a canonical one
JMESPath might do the thing, or we treat the "canonical" HTML5 output as the thing, get those cell ids in there, etc.
Anyhow: I would not start with the code in that repo.
It looks very react-centric. As we've seen, it's desirable to have CodeEditor, the latex renderer, etc. to allow folks to customize stuff in a more Lab-centered way, and trying to shoehorn these into a lumino-react-lumino sandwich is no fun for anybody. We'd want the jupyterlab-markup, probably some nifty widgets for uploading, etc.
The sidebar UI concept is not really my favorite... ideally, there would be a preferred way to add Big Gutters to document activities that allowed stuff to play out nicely in e.g. single-document mode, jupyterlab-classic that could intelligently move cards up and down based on scroll position. This will get super-complicated with the virtual rendering.
So, I'd propose:
keep making this one as awesome as possible for the rich data model we have
keep in the back of our mind (as you have been on some of the refactorin 👍) that it isn't just about pull requests, using generic terms
eventually split this repo into a lerna project, where the @jupyterlab/comment-cards or whatever is easy to observe
Should we build on top of a common set of discussion components with https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-commenting?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: