Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Any progress on TWBS 4.1? #70

Open
hbjydev opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Any progress on TWBS 4.1? #70

hbjydev opened this issue Nov 2, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@hbjydev
Copy link

hbjydev commented Nov 2, 2018

I know you said you were working on it in #65 but I haven't seen any non-vanilla-BS changes in 9 months. If you know of an updated fork you could point me to at least, that'd be great.

@dessalines
Copy link

Same, anyone know of a fork that's doing this work?

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

sure, this is such a silly project to take seriously ... guess I'll do that soon.

@dessalines
Copy link

dessalines commented Apr 13, 2020

I have a pseudo theme that kinda looks like this, but its not anywhere near as complete. _variables.i386.scss I too would love to see this updated to work with bootstrap 4+

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

you may have noticed ... the commits are coming in. It's going to be a lot of work to transform this thing over. It's all in ems which we can't use. Well ok, I could technically use it ... the problem is that (r)em is (r)em whether vertical or horizontal and the DOS fonts are rectangles. There's technically 3: 9x14, 8x14 and 8x8 but I need to pick one so I use 8x14 for the calculations.

Now yes, of course, sure, 14/8 is 1.75 so I could use that multiplier throughout and fall back to rems ... ok, sure ... and it would be some kind of sick acrobatic exercise, just to my liking in doing a pixel based system using rems, but my work is already cut out for me right now.

So I'm pursuing px based measurements. I may decide to do the rem based approach just because it'd be funnier though ... we'll see how it progresses.

@kristopolous
Copy link
Owner

alright sure I'll do a hybrid for now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants