Welcome to KubeEdge Dashboard!
Please make sure to read and observe our Code of Conduct.
KubeEdge is a community project driven by its community which strives to promote a healthy, friendly and productive environment. The goal of the community is to develop a cloud native edge computing platform built on top of Kubernetes to manage edge nodes and devices at scale and demonstrate resiliency, reliability in offline scenarios. To build a platform at such scale requires the support of a community with similar aspirations.
- See Community Membership for a list of various community roles. With gradual contributions, one can move up in the chain.
- Fork the repository on GitHub
- Read the setup for deployment KubeEdge cluster
- Setup Dashboard process
We will help you to contribute in different areas like filing issues, developing features, fixing critical bugs and getting your work reviewed and merged.
If you have questions about the development process, feel free to jump into our Slack#dashboard or join our mailing list.
We are always in need of help, be it fixing documentation, reporting bugs or writing some code. Look at places where you feel best coding practices aren't followed, code refactoring is needed or tests are missing. Here is how you get started.
There are multiple repositories within the KubeEdge organization. Each repository has beginner-friendly issues that provide a good first issue. For example, kubeedge/dashboard has help wanted and good first issue labels for issues that should not need deep knowledge of the system. We can help new contributors who wish to work on such issues.
Another good way to contribute is to find a documentation improvement, such as a missing/broken link. Please see Contributing below for the workflow.
When you are willing to take on an issue, you can assign it to yourself. Just reply with /assign
or /assign @yourself
on an issue,
then the robot will assign the issue to you and your name will present at Assignees
list.
While we encourage everyone to contribute code, it is also appreciated when someone reports an issue. Issues should be filed under the appropriate KubeEdge sub-repository.
Example: A KubeEdge dashboard issue should be opened to kubeedge/dashboard.
Please follow the prompted submission guidelines while opening an issue.
Please do not ever hesitate to ask a question or send a pull request.
This is a rough outline of what a contributor's workflow looks like:
- Create a topic branch from where to base the contribution. This is usually main.
- Make commits of logical units.
- Make sure commit messages are in the proper format (see below).
- Push changes in a topic branch to a personal fork of the repository.
- Submit a pull request to kubeedge/dashboard.
- The PR must receive an approval from two maintainers.
Pull requests are often called simply "PR". KubeEdge generally follows the standard GitHub pull request process. To submit a proposed change, please develop the code/fix and add new test cases. After that, run these local verifications before submitting pull request to predict the pass or fail of continuous integration.
- Run and pass
make verify
- Run and pass
make edge_test
ormake cloud_test
- Run and pass
make edge_integration_test
In addition to the above process, a bot will begin applying structured labels to your PR.
The bot may also make some helpful suggestions for commands to run in your PR to facilitate review.
These /command
options can be entered in comments to trigger auto-labeling and notifications.
Refer to its command reference documentation.
To make it easier for your PR to receive reviews, consider the reviewers will need you to:
- follow good coding guidelines.
- write good commit messages.
- break large changes into a logical series of smaller patches which individually make easily understandable changes, and in aggregate solve a broader issue.
- label PRs with appropriate reviewers: to do this read the messages the bot sends you to guide you through the PR process.
We follow a rough convention for commit messages that is designed to answer two questions: what changed and why. The subject line should feature the what and the body of the commit should describe the why.
scripts: add test codes for metamanager
this add some unit test codes to improve code coverage for metamanager
Fixes #12
The format can be described more formally as follows:
<subsystem>: <what changed>
<BLANK LINE>
<why this change was made>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>
The first line is the subject and should be no longer than 70 characters, the second line is always blank, and other lines should be wrapped at 80 characters. This allows the message to be easier to read on GitHub as well as in various git tools.
Note: if your pull request isn't getting enough attention, you can use the reach out on Slack to get help finding reviewers.
Continuous integration will run these tests on PRs.