So there's no concepts? Your concepts page is empty.

[warmbasket]

So there's no concepts? Your concepts page is empty.

[warmbasket]

https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/concepts/ links only to this https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/concepts/multi-tenancy/

[sftim]

This is an open source project. Help is welcome.

[sftim]

/priority awaiting-more-evidence

[google-oss-prow]

@sftim: The label(s) priority/awaiting-more-evidence cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

In response to this:

/priority awaiting-more-evidence

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[warmbasket]

@sftim There's no concepts, close the page in the meantime then? 🤯

[varodrig]

/help

[google-oss-prow]

@varodrig:
This request has been marked as needing help from a contributor.

Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
by commenting with the /remove-help command.

In response to this:

/help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[varodrig]

we need help drafting a proposal of what information should be displayed in this web page.

also looking for comments from

@andreyvelich @terrytangyuan @thesuperzapper

[varodrig]

cc @kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @kubeflow/wg-pipeline-leads @kubeflow/wg-notebooks-leads @kubeflow/wg-manifests-leads @kubeflow/release-team @kubeflow/wg-data-leads @kubeflow/wg-deployment-leads

[rareddy]

I vote to remove and comeback when we have something concrete we want to share.

[varodrig]

I vote to remove and comeback when we have something concrete we want to share.

Currently, we have the https://www.kubeflow.org/docs/concepts/multi-tenancy/ which is out of date.

[varodrig]

I propose to remove this page as well, Not sure what was planned to include here when it was created.
thoughts?
@kubeflow/kubeflow-steering-committee @kubeflow/wg-training-leads @kubeflow/wg-pipeline-leads @kubeflow/wg-notebooks-leads @kubeflow/wg-manifests-leads @kubeflow/release-team @kubeflow/wg-data-leads @kubeflow/wg-deployment-leads

[franciscojavierarceo]

Yeah, agreed.

[thesuperzapper]

I agree to remove, it's not correct anymore.

If we remove the Concepts / Multi-Tenancy section, I propose we redirect the pages to the Components / Central Dashboard / Profiles and Namespaces, as this is the most up-to-date information about how multi-tenancy works.

Also, we can hide the Concepts folder from the sidebar because it would then be empty.

In the future we could consider adding concepts back, but I am not sure if "cross-component concepts" even make sense, so it probably makes more sense to have a "concepts" section for each component.

[thesuperzapper]

I have created a PR to remove the "Concepts" / "Multi-Tenancy" section and redirect the pages as described above:

• Remove "Concepts" / "Multi-Tenancy" section #3977