-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Output tables for commands should be the same as kubectl tables #5493
Comments
This issue needs to be resolved before I can open a PR olekukonko/tablewriter#129 |
while I agree to match kubernetes style as much possible, changing this would be a breaking change, but I purpose ! having the option for the users to have the output in different ways
|
Yea, I wanted to build something on top of minikube and I saw this really crazy table output and thought. Why don't I just help them become normal :-D. Anyway. The breaking change part I'm not really following. You mean if people built a tool that wraps the shell command? Ok fine you're right but we have to live with that table format forever? It's really hard to awk with a bash script. gah. I personally would be fine if you just had a json format for now as it would solve my use case. |
I personally am OK with breaking users who parse stdout of commands unless they have defined a Related: #5080 - it sounds like we should have an analogous issue for profile. |
I would happily review a PR that addresses this issue, having json output would make a lot of people happy ! |
The exact command to reproduce the issue:
minikube profile list
The full output of the command that failed:
The operating system version:
Why don't we use a regular table like kubectl uses without pipe separators? It makes it harder to wrap scripts around minikube when we are doing this. I would expect something like this instead:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: