From 54b660c495a4bddff48ecc801b223cdaf1d1b425 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Beshoy Kamel <91009118+bwkam@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 19:00:07 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] wee -> we (#67)

^

Signed-off-by: Beshoy Kamel <91009118+bwkam@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Stanislav (Stanley) Modrak <44023416+smith558@users.noreply.github.com>
---
 markdown/source_md/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/markdown/source_md/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids.md b/markdown/source_md/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids.md
index 2d7dcfe..d93c175 100644
--- a/markdown/source_md/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids.md
+++ b/markdown/source_md/functors-applicative-functors-and-monoids.md
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@ instance Functor Maybe where
 ```
 
 We imagine that `id` plays the role of the `f` parameter in the implementation.
-We see that if wee `fmap id` over `Just x`, the result will be `Just (id x)`, and because `id` just returns its parameter, we can deduce that `Just (id x)` equals `Just x`.
+We see that if we `fmap id` over `Just x`, the result will be `Just (id x)`, and because `id` just returns its parameter, we can deduce that `Just (id x)` equals `Just x`.
 So now we know that if we map `id` over a `Maybe` value with a `Just` value constructor, we get that same value back.
 
 Seeing that mapping `id` over a `Nothing` value returns the same value is trivial.