Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

loss不下降，dice不高 #16

Open
NBIronman opened this issue May 8, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

loss不下降，dice不高 #16

NBIronman opened this issue May 8, 2021 · 3 comments

Comments

@NBIronman
Copy link

NBIronman commented May 8, 2021 •
edited
Loading

你好，我用您的模型跑了一下只分割肝脏的，结果loss降到0.3左右就不再下降了，dice1也只能达到0.7多，请问您自己能跑到0.9多不是用的这个网络吗？
@NBIronman NBIronman changed the title los loss不下降，dice不高 May 8, 2021
@zz10001
Copy link

zz10001 commented May 11, 2021

你好，我用您的模型跑了一下只分割肝脏的，结果loss降到0.3左右就不再下降了，dice1也只能达到0.7多，请问您自己能跑到0.9多不是用的这个网络吗？

如果只分割肝脏的话，可以试试这个MICCAI-LITS2017

@NBIronman
Copy link
Author

你好，我用您的模型跑了一下只分割肝脏的，结果loss降到0.3左右就不再下降了，dice1也只能达到0.7多，请问您自己能跑到0.9多不是用的这个网络吗？

如果只分割肝脏的话，可以试试这个MICCAI-LITS2017

好的，谢谢。我去看看

@Ron-carry
Copy link

Hi~ I have a thinking :
I wonder if it is that this project used "Early stopping method" causes the results----low dice and un-ascending loss.
If not using "Early stopping method" , I want to know if I can get better results, because this project can achieve "Saving best model".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@zz10001 @Ron-carry @NBIronman