Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] arm32v7-latest image is built for linux/amd64 architecture #367

Closed
1 task done
deadmoto opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed
1 task done

[BUG] arm32v7-latest image is built for linux/amd64 architecture #367

deadmoto opened this issue Jul 26, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@deadmoto
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Current Behavior

Upgrading to the latest image leads to image with reference lscr.io/linuxserver/plex:arm32v7-latest was found but does not match the specified platform: wanted linux/arm/v7, actual: linux/amd64 error.

Expected Behavior

Upgrade must succeed.

Steps To Reproduce

  1. Deploy arm32v7-1.32.4 image (last one with linux/arm/v7 arch)
  2. Upgrade to arm32v7-latest

Environment

- OS: Armbian 22.08.2 Jammy
- How docker service was installed: distro's packagemanager (apt)

CPU architecture

x86-64

Docker creation

docker-compose.yml:

version: "3.9"
services:
  plex:
    platform: linux/arm/v7
    image: lscr.io/linuxserver/plex:arm32v7-latest

command: /docker-compose up --build plex



### Container logs

```bash
docker-compose output:

[+] Running 0/1
 ⠋ Container orangepi4-lts-plex-1  Recreate                                                                                       0.1s 
Error response from daemon: image with reference lscr.io/linuxserver/plex:arm32v7-latest was found but does not match the specified platform: wanted linux/arm/v7, actual: linux/amd64
`docker-compose` process finished with exit code 1
@github-actions
Copy link

Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the relevant issue templates, or risk having this issue marked as invalid.

@aptalca
Copy link
Member

aptalca commented Jul 26, 2023

@aptalca aptalca closed this as completed Jul 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants