You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to be able to ldoc -c ./config.ld path/file.lua and get the exact same docs/modules/file.html that I would get if I ran ldoc .. This might involve multiple new options to change behaviors around file naming and references.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's not clear to me why simply targeting a file produces such wildly different results than the file being included when targeting a directory currently. Is there any documentation, or even a particular part of the source, I should be looking at to better understand that?
I don't know (I'm an outsider that inherited a maintenance role on this project not the author so I'm just poking around like you) but I would guess it has to do with how the menus and such are generated. In fact it's probably not possible to get the same output without processing a whole project since what things to cross link and what things to put in menus wouldn't be known at all if not processing the whole project. That doesn't mean a mode couldn't be scrapped together to only update one output file even if the whole project still had to be scanned.
I would like to be able to
ldoc -c ./config.ld path/file.lua
and get the exact samedocs/modules/file.html
that I would get if I ranldoc .
. This might involve multiple new options to change behaviors around file naming and references.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: