Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat!: renaming the python module #151

Open
santiagorr opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #155
Open

feat!: renaming the python module #151

santiagorr opened this issue Dec 14, 2024 · 5 comments · May be fixed by #155
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@santiagorr
Copy link

Dear py-serializable developers,

I am working on packaging py-serializable for debian (especially because it is a dependency of cyclonedx-python-lib), and I would like to kindly ask you to consider renaming the python module.

Unfortunately, there is another serializable module, packaged already in debian as python-serializable. serializable and py-serializable install their files under the serializable module, so they are not co-installable. And giving serializable is already found in the debian archive (but it is also valid installing via pip), I am taking the liberty to ask to you to rename the module. pyserializable could be an option.

I know this creates issues for projects/modules/libraries depending on py-serializable, but I cannot think about other easier approach, if co-installability is required.

Thank you!

@jkowalleck
Copy link
Collaborator

jkowalleck commented Dec 15, 2024

i could imagine renaming the installed package py_serializable could help prevent confusion.
this way, the runtime-package would have the same name as the PyPI-package.

@madpah, how do you feel about this?

@madpah
Copy link
Owner

madpah commented Dec 16, 2024

Not against it @jkowalleck.

@jkowalleck
Copy link
Collaborator

I'd let this sink in,
and will work on a solution early 2025

@jkowalleck jkowalleck changed the title Please cosider renaming the python module feat!: renaming the python module Dec 16, 2024
@jkowalleck

This comment was marked as resolved.

@jkowalleck jkowalleck self-assigned this Dec 16, 2024
@madpah madpah added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Jan 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants