You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, typechecking is performed only dynamically. This leads to a compile/test cycle that's much longer than it needs to be if the rule wouldn't trigger until later in the program.
Explore using a procedural macro (Rust Macros 2.0) pending stabilization of that feature.
Unless I'm misreading, 1.1 will only allow me to write #[derive()] macros, so to use that all rules would need to be in the form of a type declaration, which is possibly the only way to get weirder than my current edsl.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently, typechecking is performed only dynamically. This leads to a compile/test cycle that's much longer than it needs to be if the rule wouldn't trigger until later in the program.
Explore using a procedural macro (Rust Macros 2.0) pending stabilization of that feature.
Unless I'm misreading, 1.1 will only allow me to write
#[derive()]
macros, so to use that all rules would need to be in the form of a type declaration, which is possibly the only way to get weirder than my current edsl.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: