You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering why, in the pedigrees below, sisters 3 and 4 are displayed in the wrong order. I understand that siblings are sometimes shuffled to improve the overall display, but in these symmetrical cases I cannot see any reason for doing so.
I think I have tracked the behaviour down to autohint(), but it is not clear to me what exactly this tries to optimize, nor why it is overzealous in my examples.
Hi,
I was wondering why, in the pedigrees below, sisters 3 and 4 are displayed in the wrong order. I understand that siblings are sometimes shuffled to improve the overall display, but in these symmetrical cases I cannot see any reason for doing so.
I think I have tracked the behaviour down to
autohint()
, but it is not clear to me what exactly this tries to optimize, nor why it is overzealous in my examples.First example:
Another example:
Created on 2022-03-24 by the reprex package (v2.0.1)
All the best,
Magnus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: