Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add samples for HTZSafe 1/2 Mile Solar Wireless Driveway Alarm #419

Open
stutteringp0et opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 9 comments
Open

Comments

@stutteringp0et
Copy link

stutteringp0et commented Feb 14, 2022

I haven't had any luck locating the manufacturer website, but this brand/model of driveway alarm is available everywhere - amazon, walmart, ebay - it's all over the place. The model number is HB-T001Q3 and I have found its FCC application info. Not only does the model number match, but the diagrams show the particular units I'm working with.

https://fccid.io/2AJP6HB-T001Q3/

In the attached sample files, I triggered the alarm twice. I am fairly remote, and running rtl_433 to listen to my environment found no signals, so this test should be clean of interference. The receiver unit has the ability to assign different tones to each sensor, so I assume that each sensor transmits a unique ID

rtl_433.zip
.

@stutteringp0et stutteringp0et changed the title HZTSafe 1/2 Mile Solar Wireless Driveway Alarm HTZSafe 1/2 Mile Solar Wireless Driveway Alarm Feb 16, 2022
@zuckschwerdt zuckschwerdt changed the title HTZSafe 1/2 Mile Solar Wireless Driveway Alarm Add samples for HTZSafe 1/2 Mile Solar Wireless Driveway Alarm Feb 16, 2023
@klohner
Copy link
Contributor

klohner commented Apr 13, 2023

@stutteringp0et - did you figure this out? I took a look at the samples you'd attached and there's nothing useful in them.

Based on the FCC ID page you'd referenced, these devices operate at 434.6 MHz but you seem to have recorded your samples at 433.92 MHz and I'd suspect the signal was not received. If you're still interested, please provide some samples recorded at the correct frequency and I'll take a look.

@kramttocs
Copy link

Also interested in this. Does 433.92 not also capture 434.6?

Or is that not what this means?

"433.050 MHz to 434.790 MHz"

@zuckschwerdt
Copy link
Collaborator

No, 434.6M is out of band. It's a band of "sample rate"-width. E.g. 433.795 to 434.045 MHz at the default 433.92 "center frequency" and 250 kHz sample rate.

@kramttocs
Copy link

kramttocs commented Aug 27, 2024

Thanks @zuckschwerdt I've been trying to capture something but Universal Radio Hacker isn't showing anything. I am using that since I assume I should be able to see something there to know if the samples I provide are useful.

Edit: mine may be different than the original report.
Looks like the manual shows it as 433MHz FSK+FHSS

Edit 2: well, it's the same model number as the link in the OP so I don't know...

@zuckschwerdt
Copy link
Collaborator

Hard to imagine that a simple "doorbell"-style sender would use FHSS. But that would show as hard to capture, something more like a LoRA signal.

@kramttocs
Copy link

That sounds unfortunate

@klohner
Copy link
Contributor

klohner commented Aug 27, 2024

It's out of band by default, but it's simple enough just to specify the frequency you want to listen to.

Something this should record the signal for further analysis:

rtl_433 -f 434.6M -s 1000k -S all

@kramttocs
Copy link

rtl_433_driveway_1.zip

Thanks. Do these contain anything?

@zuckschwerdt
Copy link
Collaborator

No, there is no signal. Drop files on https://triq.org/pdv/ -- if you see just smooth color there is nothing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants