-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comparison / contrast with Kompose #48
Comments
Hi, The benefits is that:
Of course, Katenary is not perfect. Kompose has got many benefits (for example, it let you choose the target type, while Katenary exclusively uses helm) |
Wow, congratulations @metal3d on the new baby! This is really great context; thank you! I'll give Katenary a try now too. I think the Would you consider if helpful if I werw to summarize your list above into a new 'Why Katenary' section in the README? |
Just saw this now, I wanted to let you know @bcdady a big thanks for this tool. Kompose hasn't been able to maintain the Helm support for the last couple of years as Helm continued to move very fast. With your consent, could we add a link to your tool when we eventually close kubernetes/kompose#1716 ? We'll add it to the README / direct users to your tool as the support for compose to helm is a lot more superior than what we have in Kompose at the moment. |
Hi.
Of course you can 🙂
I'm currently fixing last issues I've got for the next release that will
provide a lot more features.
It's a bit complicated as I just start a new job in a new company.
Le mer. 22 nov. 2023, 16:17, Charlie Drage ***@***.***> a
écrit :
… Just saw this now, I wanted to let you know @bcdady
<https://github.com/bcdady> a big thanks for this tool. Kompose hasn't
been able to maintain the Helm support for the last couple of years as Helm
continued to move very fast.
With your consent, could we add a link to your tool when we eventually
close kubernetes/kompose#1716
<kubernetes/kompose#1716> ? We'll add it to the
README / direct users to your tool as the support for compose to helm is a
lot more superior than what we have in Kompose at the moment.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#48 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAYN4CFY7YWWIJU4SUR6H3YFYJPDAVCNFSM6AAAAAAT3OELUWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMRSHE3DONRSGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
The develop branch is, ASAIK, working with my local examples. I need a proper testing mecanism and I will release a V3-alpha as soon as possible. Sorry for the delay. My life has been a little too busy lately, but I swear I'm doing my utmost to get this version out as soon as possible. Hopefully, before the end of April 2024 (certainly sooner). |
You can, if possible, now, try the master branch |
I've just now learned of both this tool, and also learned of Kompose (from this kubernetes.io page).
Could the contributors/maintainers help clarify benefits or difference that might help me appreciate if Katenary might be a better tool for my use case, when compared to Kompose?
At first glance, there appear to be many similarities. The fact that Kompose is part of the 'Kubernetes' organization (in GitHub as well as being referenced from the aforementioned Kubernetes.io docs) seems to suggest it may be a more active/useful tool to consider.
Perhaps an acknowledgement of the Kompose tool and a brief explanation of when/why/how Katenary might be a beneficial choice would help the larger container user community understand the value proposition.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: