Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(from ISO/IEC 2382:2015) Bibliographic references status (withdrawn/cancelled) should be shown adhering to publication date #941

Open
ronaldtse opened this issue Nov 14, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

ronaldtse commented Nov 14, 2024

This document is ISO/IEC 2382:2015 at:

Basically, a document's references should reflect its bibliographic references according to its publication date, e.g. should not render the "withdrawn/replaced" footnote beyond its own publishing date.

Since this document was already published and has replaced a number of its references, it is now showing that it "itself" has cancelled and replaced its references. Which is incorrect because at the year it was published, those documents were not cancelled/replaced (until this particular document was published!).

image

We need to set the "publication date" (or an override) so that the bibliographic items are "rewound" to that publication date when generating references.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2024
@ronaldtse ronaldtse changed the title (from ISO/IEC 2382:2015) Historical documents should not cite "withdrawn/replaced" footnote beyond its own publishing year (from ISO/IEC 2382:2015) Bibliographic references status (withdrawn/cancelled) should be shown adhering to publication date Nov 14, 2024
@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually this ticket is identical to:

Moving this to metanorma-standoc.

@ronaldtse ronaldtse transferred this issue from metanorma/metanorma-iso Nov 14, 2024
@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

Backdating the reference fetch and backdating the superseding footnotes within the reference are likely distinct tasks, and the two tickets are requesting them separately.

@opoudjis
Copy link
Contributor

On hold pending #773

@opoudjis opoudjis moved this from 🌋 Urgent to On hold in Metanorma Nov 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: On hold
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants