You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello, folks, I've been struggling a bit in order to understand what's the difference between set_and_verify_collection and verify_collection. As per what I (believe I could) understand, the first one sets a regular NFT as a MPL collection, while the second one only verifies it.
I've noticed a few things, though.
In both methods, I've seen that the instruction needs both metadata and collection_metadata (which takes *ctx.accounts.collection_metadata.key ) accounts. So, probably the collection_metadata refers to the NFT created with by create_metadata_accounts_v3, whose details parameter is Some(CollectionDetails::V1 { size: 10 }), for instance. Now, the metadata refers to what, specifically? Should I create a new metadata account in order to provide that data? If so, should it be mutable? Should it also provide a detailsOption other than None? And, the most important, how do I derive it's address? Rn, I'm passing the collection metadata derived access like that:
Last but not least, I've noticed that both set_and_verify_collection and verify_collection both accept collection_authority_record, should I derive another PDA just for that, or setting Some(ctx.accounts.signer.key()) will suffice?
I'm using anchor_spl 0.28, which depends on mpl-token-metadata ^1.11
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello, folks, I've been struggling a bit in order to understand what's the difference between
set_and_verify_collection
andverify_collection
. As per what I (believe I could) understand, the first one sets a regular NFT as a MPL collection, while the second one only verifies it.I've noticed a few things, though.
In both methods, I've seen that the instruction needs both
metadata
andcollection_metadata
(which takes*ctx.accounts.collection_metadata.key
) accounts. So, probably thecollection_metadata
refers to the NFT created with bycreate_metadata_accounts_v3
, whosedetails
parameter isSome(CollectionDetails::V1 { size: 10 })
, for instance. Now, the metadata refers to what, specifically? Should I create a new metadata account in order to provide that data? If so, should it be mutable? Should it also provide adetails
Option
other thanNone
? And, the most important, how do I derive it's address? Rn, I'm passing the collection metadata derived access like that:Last but not least, I've noticed that both
set_and_verify_collection
andverify_collection
both acceptcollection_authority_record
, should I derive another PDA just for that, or settingSome(ctx.accounts.signer.key())
will suffice?I'm using
anchor_spl
0.28, which depends onmpl-token-metadata
^1.11Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: