Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider upgrading to Sphinx 2.x #1

Closed
joostverburg opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider upgrading to Sphinx 2.x #1

joostverburg opened this issue Oct 3, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
@tmadden

Comments

@joostverburg
Copy link

Several extensions for Sphinx are no longer compatible with Sphinx 1.x but require Sphinx 2.x. It would therefore be nice to upgrade.

The current left side navigation menu style does not work properly with Sphinx 2.x.
@tmadden
Copy link
Contributor

tmadden commented Oct 3, 2019

I agree. I have too many clinical developments going on at the moment to work on this, but I'll put it on my radar for later this fall...

@tmadden tmadden self-assigned this Dec 2, 2019
@tmadden
Copy link
Contributor

tmadden commented Jun 4, 2020

I made a 2.0.0 release of the documentation system that uses Sphinx 3.x. You won't get it automatically, but it's very simple to opt into using it. See here:

https://github.com/mghro/documentation-scripts/releases/tag/2.0.0

I'm assuming that Sphinx 3.x meets your needs. If for some reason you specifically need 2.x, feel free to reopen this.

@tmadden tmadden closed this as completed Jun 4, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@tmadden tmadden

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@tmadden @joostverburg