You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
When I read through the LONG-CONTEXT BENCHMARKS section of your paper, I found there will be no latency improvement when using chunk size = context length. I can understand this result as this seems like just full attention, without KV cache pruned.
I found you mentioned in the appendix of the paper that block-sparse-attention was used for training. I am wondering if it could also be used in inference for pre-filling the full context, if memory is enough. As it calculate the full context with some middle attention calculation skipped.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
When I read through the LONG-CONTEXT BENCHMARKS section of your paper, I found there will be no latency improvement when using chunk size = context length. I can understand this result as this seems like just full attention, without KV cache pruned.
I found you mentioned in the appendix of the paper that block-sparse-attention was used for training. I am wondering if it could also be used in inference for pre-filling the full context, if memory is enough. As it calculate the full context with some middle attention calculation skipped.
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: