From 1ee9129d856c1f94c3ed7a641a391e0b6241ae82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Isaac Devine Date: Sat, 4 May 2013 16:18:20 +1200 Subject: [PATCH] Fix example of equivalence between java and sql The equivalent concept of a sql table in java is a class. Fix the mistake in the API documentation which refers to objects instead. --- src/edu/mit/mobile/android/content/SimpleContentProvider.java | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/edu/mit/mobile/android/content/SimpleContentProvider.java b/src/edu/mit/mobile/android/content/SimpleContentProvider.java index 839fc87..04f7805 100644 --- a/src/edu/mit/mobile/android/content/SimpleContentProvider.java +++ b/src/edu/mit/mobile/android/content/SimpleContentProvider.java @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ * *

* {@link ContentItem}s describe the data that you wish to be persisted. In SQL terms, these would - * be your tables or in Java terms, your objects. Unlike ORMs which have typed fields, these are + * be your tables or in Java terms, your classes. Unlike ORMs which have typed fields, these are * constructed using classes with numerous static fields that describe the data. This is done in * order to avoid creation of short-lived data objects, which would lead to considerable garbage * collector churn.