Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
38 lines (31 loc) · 2.03 KB

rubric.md

File metadata and controls

38 lines (31 loc) · 2.03 KB

Evaluation Rubric

Point Scale

Value Description
0 Missing: Student did not submit assignment.
1 Incomplete: The assignment is handed in late, undocumented, or otherwise not following the instructions.
2 Complete: The assignment is complete and follows the criteria outlined below.
3 Outstanding: The assignment has a highly creative concept and above and beyond documentation.

Criteria (aka “how to get a 3”)

Project Documentation

  • Is the full story of the project described including ideas, triumphs and failures? (It’s ok if the project doesn’t work or if you struggled, just tell the story!)
  • Are sources of inspiration and code examples cited?
  • Are classmates and others who helped you referenced?
  • Is there comprehensive visual documentation (not just of the final result, but of the steps along the way)?
  • Does it include thoughts on next steps?

Code

  • Does the code demonstrate an understanding of the course material?
  • Are code sources credited clearly in the comments?
  • Did the student go beyond the examples provided by incorporating their own ideas or additional programming concepts not covered in class?
  • Is it legible or human readable? Are things named appropriately?
  • Is it commented? If the student were to look at the code in a month, would they be able to know what they did and why?
  • Does the code leverage any patterns or approaches that are noteworthy?

Reading Responses

  • Are new questions asked?
  • Is there a point of view / argument made?
  • Are additional sources and references mentioned?
  • Is the post funny, novel, or otherwise unique?

Sources