-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 96
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Offline BGC #395
Comments
Thanks for opening an issue on this @aidanheerdegen. With regard to other BGC models, the answer is yes. The NEMO-PISCES community have been doing this for many years. I'm unsure why at MOM they haven't pushed this forward, but I have a meeting with Charlie Stock this week to see if he has his own set up for BGC model development at GFDL. He and John Dunne and others there may well have their own personal set-ups. With regard to the required fields, in addition to the Temperature and Salinity tracers you would also need transports through the faces of the grid cells. pearse |
Dale was looking at this (but was that for MOM6?) |
Courtesy of @chrisb13 https://forge.ipsl.jussieu.fr/nemo/chrome/site/doc/TOP/manual/pdf/TOP_manual.pdf
Seems there is some support for this in MOM6 already: https://mom6.readthedocs.io/en/main/api/generated/modules/mom_offline_main.html but would probably require some work to get it configured and functioning. |
Yes, for MOM6: COSIMA/access-om3#123 |
At the recent ACCESS Community Workshop the need for offline BGC was identified.
This was particularly the case for more complicated versions of WOMBAT, for use with higher resolutions and for long spin-ups to equilibrate carbon pools and for paleo climate modelling.
In theory it shouldn't be too difficult to create a driver for offline mode to read in saved ocean tracer fields to drive the BGC model.
Has this been done for any of the other BGC models?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: