Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Timur: Views should support manipulating table data #1212

Open
coleshaw opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Timur: Views should support manipulating table data #1212

coleshaw opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Timur For the Timur sub-tree

Comments

@coleshaw
Copy link
Collaborator

coleshaw commented Feb 9, 2023

Use case is for AIP1, score model. It would be nice to be able to define the order or appearance of clinical table data, most likely by supporting:

  • Selection of attribute values, within a specific attribute name (i.e. category)
  • Negative selection of attribute values, within a specific attribute name

The current use case is a score model with the following attributes:

  • type
  • category
  • category_value

We would like to configure a view such that, in a separate tab:

  • Specific category values matching a regex would be listed at the top (i.e. clasi_score)
  • All other related category variables would be listed below (i.e. clasi_* but !clasi_score)
@coleshaw coleshaw added enhancement New feature or request Timur For the Timur sub-tree labels Feb 9, 2023
@graft
Copy link
Contributor

graft commented Feb 9, 2023

Hmm, we could perhaps achieve the same desired result by allowing column-wise sorting and filtering features?

@coleshaw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

That would be a question for @bsamad , but I think she wants to pin a specific row to the top, not exactly let users sort arbitrarily...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Timur For the Timur sub-tree
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants