Search function split distinguish issue

[ephemarel]

It seems that the search function does not distinguish between different split parts of a split transaction.

For instance, if I want to search for just transactions that are in the [apple] category with the {rotten} tag, it will show the following split in that search (because it has the category and the tag, even though the tag does not apply to that category):

Split 10

• 6 [apple] {fresh}
• 4 [orange] {rotten}

It didn't include any of these transactions in the dollar amount totals at the top of each date range grouping, but it does include them in the search, and there seems to be no way to exclude them if I only want {rotten} [apple]s. Can this be helped?

Thank you!

[mtotschnig]

@ephemarel Thanks for bringing this up. The reason why the split transaction is included in the result, but not accounted fro in the total, is that the 2 queries behave differently, Transactions are selected based on applying each criterion separately to the splits, whereas for the total the combination of the criteria is applied to each split. It is not trivial to fix this, but I'll try.

[ephemarel]

Thank you! It's not of utmost importance... As long as they differentiate for the purposes of budgeting, I'll be ok. Though I would love to see this fixed if you're able!