You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to the article, 'geodesic influence zone' is ignored in this implementing. This is not a problem, the pseudocode that provided in the article who`s purpose is calculating 'geodesic influence distance' is of no using.
The real problem is that detecting and processing new minima will not work under a circumstance.
Here is the diagram illustrating the circumstance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey, thanks for raising this issue. I didn't read the paper in great detail, to be honest. My implementation was sufficient for my needs. Are you willing to take care of the implementation of the geodesic influence zone? I'm happy to review and accept any pull requests.
According to the article, 'geodesic influence zone' is ignored in this implementing. This is not a problem, the pseudocode that provided in the article who`s purpose is calculating 'geodesic influence distance' is of no using.
The real problem is that detecting and processing new minima will not work under a circumstance.
Here is the diagram illustrating the circumstance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: