-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Module 1 Global Cooling Error Slide #824
Comments
@katblanchette change troposhphere image Errors Discovered Other scientists found that, due to nuances in the data, the original authors... |
Change text from 'This oversight introduced errors into the dataset and falsely produced artificial cooling to the temperature measurements.' to 'This oversight introduced errors in the interpretation of the dataset and falsely produced artificial cooling in the temperature measurements." |
@brian-knosp - Thank you for the information! We have shared this information at our OS101 disposition meeting with our internal team and decided to update the text to reflect the nuances. |
Also change from 'Eight years after the article was published, other scientists noticed that the original authors didn't account for several important effects.' to 'Eight years after the article was published, other scientists noticed that the original authors didn't account for several important effects, likely due to nuances in the data itself.' |
Address suggestion in issue #824
@katblanchette I believe the only thing missing for this one is the replacement image like we talked about in the comments above. The text looks fine, I had it in my notes to double check this one. |
@katblanchette I am marking this as complete on GitHub because of the updated image you sent, check out PRs #842 and #897 for the changes. |
One of the learners in my last OS101 training brought up an issue with the Module 1 Global Cooling Error Slide (Slide 16?). He was in the atmospheric chemistry field at the time when this study came out (and still is in that field). I have his full comments below, but basically, he was unsure that open science would've fixed the problem that we discuss because he remembers (admittedly vaguely) that it was more an issue with what they were looking at, rather than an error in their research. I have his full comments below that I wanted to pass along.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: