Conditional Wrapper for Nacks to build with and without #206
Unanswered
brconnell4
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thanks for the propsal. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Could we introduce a feature flag in rbac-jetstream-controller.yml to toggle the use of the RBAC template provided by NACKS? It would be ideal if this flag defaulted to true, like so:
The feature flag would act as a wrapper for the entire RBAC file.
The reason for this request is that we manage RBAC for our developers in their namespaced environments. When installing this package as part of our umbrella chart, it currently requires container.role.* permissions.
We prefer to manage these permissions ourselves, consistent with how we handle all other RBAC permissions, while allowing NACKS to focus solely on installing its JetStream controller deployment. We understand that these RBAC permissions are necessary, but we would rather not manage them directly through the NACKS Helm chart.
This isnt a hard request and can make a pull request if allowed to provide a simple solution
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions