-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-evaluate uniqueness of ASN number #70
Comments
Considerations:
|
Could be implemented by adding
fields on the model, dropping the uniqueness constraint on the asn field and adding a new one for the combination of location/tenant/asn. |
If this is current state, I would think it was incorrect, if this is future state, I am not understanding why this would be helpful? |
Good catch - I added the little word "equal-numbered" |
Environment
Proposed Functionality
Remove the
unique=True
parameter to theASNField
on the ASN model.Use Case
Re-use of private ASNs between either different locations of the same tenant or possibly between different tenants altogether.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: