Allow single-port interfaces with named ports be implemented the same way as with anonymous ports

[emil14]

It seems very reasonable that an interface can just match against the name of the method and the types of the parameters. But that doesn't mean that we should leave the parameter names off the declaration of the interfaces. It means that we can make them verbose AF to indicate exactly what the designer of the interface expected of them semantically. So your way of doing it where a developer can just not give them names at all seems like a step backwards. If someone designs a library like that then I don't want to use it, or to brake when I see him crossing the road.