Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged Replicates-Feature counts does not use the merged bams #410

Open
SuhasSrinivasan opened this issue Feb 1, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@SuhasSrinivasan
Copy link

Description of the bug

Dear Authors,

Thank you for developing and maintaining this pipeline.

There is a potential issue with the merged replicates, as it is not clear why Task 6.7 is defined as Count reads in consensus peaks relative to merged library-level alignments.

Below is the executed task

Program:featureCounts v2.0.1; Command:"featureCounts" "-F" "SAF" "-O" "--fracOverlap" "0.2" "-p" "-T" "6" "-a" "consensus_peaks.mRp.clN.saf" "-s" "0" "-o" "consensus_peaks.mRp.clN.featureCounts.txt" "D6_T_REP2.mLb.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_T_REP1.mLb.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_D_REP2.mLb.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_D_REP1.mLb.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_M_REP2.mLb.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_M_REP1.mLb.clN.sorted.bam"

Should this not be using the merged replicate BAMs?

Program:featureCounts v2.0.1; Command:"featureCounts" "-F" "SAF" "-O" "--fracOverlap" "0.2" "-p" "-T" "6" "-a" "consensus_peaks.mRp.clN.saf" "-s" "0" "-o" "consensus_peaks.mRp.clN.featureCounts.txt" "D6_T.mRp.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_D.mRp.clN.sorted.bam" "D6_M.mRp.clN.sorted.bam"

Command used and terminal output

Relevant files

No response

System information

Version of nf-core/atacseq: 2.1.2
Nextflow version: v24.10.3
Container engine: Docker 27.4.1
OS: Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS x86_64
Executor: Local
Hardware: Desktop

@SuhasSrinivasan SuhasSrinivasan added the bug Something isn't working label Feb 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant