CSP Final, N@tM Retrospective

[jm1021]

Team review is a Live review with 6/5 points, one point for each bullet.

Team theme, being ready on Monday morning, and deployment will earn you extra credit. Home page looking like Teacher page on frontend or backend will be a deduction (jmort, nighthawkcoder, teacher home page, ...)

1. runtime demo, showing key features created in project
2. planning demo, blog or description of features prior to implementation... design/planning, an article that contains preparation of key features prior to coding
3. requirements demo, planning table of issues, features and pull requests... pull request(s), an issue containing link to individual pull requests from fork or branch to main branch in GitHub
4. Live review and being ready at beginning of class on Monday (bonus credit)
5. show deployment (extra credit)
6. show feature(s) that show deployment value, ie data updates visible on multiple computers (extra credit)

Individual review contains 4/5 points, two points for each bullet.

Issue of quality, easy to read bullets/summaries on requirements, easy to find video, reference to code, utterances working, and early delivery can earn you extra credit. If Teacher is satisfied you met requirements of CPT, easily finds materials, and spends less than 5 minutes with your information that will be big indicator for extra credit.

1. one minute video, prepared in CPT style to highlight your feature with the project ie no voice and captions
2. correlation to CPT, an article that show how your features or pull requests map to College Board requirements

[TDWolff]

Torin Wolff P2 Mortensen
Github Issue

Mr M comments

1. Video is well made
2. Write up is missing requirements as of 2/26 @6:26am

[iKAN2025]

Isabel Marilla P2 Mortensen
Github Issue

Mr M comments

1. Video shows input and graphs. Also, shows some behind the scenes. Captions video flow could be better with words key technical words like "Input", "Input creates Graph", "Data Collection in Inspect", "Data Collection in Backend".
2. Write-up was sent early and redrafted for clarity. Others should collaborate on this type of update.

[tuckergol]

Tucker Golpariani
Period 2
Mortenson
Issue

Mr M comment, there is code mappings and details for everything in write up.

[RonitT1234]

Ronit Thomas
Period 1
Mr. Lopez
Issue

Mr M comments

1. Video was simple and engaging. Very nice hook. But there was some junk data that was distracting.
2. Benchmark for write-up style with side by side format. Very easy for Teacher to process it.

[DavidL0914]

David Lee
Period 2
Mr. Mortensen
Issue Link

Mr M comments

1. Video was engaging and was showing saving comments from login. Also, showing sharing across users.
2. Write-up was not easy to negotiate these great features.

IMO, captions should stay in one place. Login caption was very easy to notice. Other I missed.Mr

[Deeskili]

Cayden Shi
Period 4
Mr. Lopez
Issue

Mr M comments. This is very technical project requiring domain knowledge and is complex to share.

1. The video preview needs to be done at the same time as the game play. This is a case were captions and arrows are required. I don't think it is there yet.
2. Write-up does show a lot, but maybe too much. Needs to be chunked up. Since there is a lot of code on Input, for instance you need to pick something like key events to actions. The data structure with number is obscure to look at, what is meaning of numbers.

[hanlunli]

Hanlun Li
Period 2
Mr. Mortenson
link

[lakshusan]

Lakshanya Sankaran
Period 2 Mortensen
Issue Link

[IshanCornick]

Ishan Cornick
Period 2 Mortensen
Issue Link

[LincolnC2008]

Lincoln Crowell
Period 2 Mortensen
Issue Link

[sergi1207]

Sergi Serpukhovitinov
Period 2 Mortensen
Issue Link

[ad1tyad3sa1]

Aditya Desai
Period 2 Mortensen
Issue

• Video is on the issue and also linked on the blog.

[Imaad08]

Imaad Muzaffer
Period 1 Lopez
Issue Link

[vibha-yganji]

Vibha Ganji
Mortensen Period 2
Link to Issue

[ak146]

Andrew Kim
Period 2 Mortensen
issue

[DrishyaMody]

Drishya Mody
Period 4
Mr. Lopez

Issue

issue contains both the blog writeup and the 1 min video

[srivaidyas]

Sri Vaidyanathan S
Period 4
Mr. Lopez
Issue

[nitinsandiego]

Nitin Balaji
Period 2
Mr. Mortenson
Link to Blog
Link to Video

[saiseahawks]

Sai Talisetty
Period 5
Lopez
Link to issue

[jntpham]

Jordan Pham
Period 4
Mr. Lopez
Issue

[Saaras859]

Saaras Kodali
Period 4
Mr Lopez
GitHub Issue

[SriS126]

Sri Surapaneni
Period 5
Mr. Lopez
Issue

[beijanm]

Beijan Moniza
Period 4
Mr. Lopez
Issue

[AustinZhang1]

Austin Zhang
Period 4
Lopez
Link to Issue

[tanayshah1]

Tanay Shah
Period 5
Lopez
Link to Issue

[avanthikadaita]

Avanthika Daita
Period: 5 Mr. Lopez
Link to issue
Link to personal blog
Link to video

[herry2333]

Hao Yuan
Period 4
Lopez
issue

[Ishraqh1]

Ishraq Hossain
Mr. Lopez Period 3
Video
Issue
I also did a review with Karam

[sfremy]

Remy Liu
Period 4 Lopez CSP
Issue (Video included)

[PatrickHastings2]

Patrick Hastings
period 4 lopez
issue
video

[KaiyuSugiyama]

Kaiyu Sugiyama
Period 4
Mr. Lopez
Issue
Video

[sumedhaKl]

Sumedha Kamaraju
Period 4 Lopez
Link to Issue
Includes video

[jkaeshim]

Jake Shim
Mr Lopez Period 4
Link to Issue

[HowieNguyen21]

Howie Nguyen
Mr Lopez Period 4
Link to Issue

[Aditi99b]

Aditi Bharadwaj
Mr. Lopez Period 5
Link to Issue

[cliang1]

Cindy Liang
Mr. Lopez Per.5
Link to Issue

[SOoctosnake]

Soham Kulkarni
Period 5
Mr. Lopez
link to issue

[devaSas1]

Deva Sasikumar
Period 5
Mr. Lopez

devaSas1/student#4

[AdiBricks]

Aditya Ramesh
Period 5
Mr. Lopez

Blog

[Delta760]

Grayson Guyot
Period 5 Mr.Lopez
Issue link: Delta760/Student3#1

[ChrisP121]

Chris Park
Period 1 Mr. Lopez
video
issue

[danielchoi2008]

Daniel Choi
P.4
Mr. Lopez
Link to issue

[Be1uga4life]

Eric Yu
P.4
Mr. Lopez
Video
Blog

[yooanthony]

Anthony Yoo
Period 1 Mr. Lopez
Link to issue

[samhita-l]

Samhita Lagisetti
Period 5 Mr. Lopez
Link to Issue

[alaraipek]

Alara Ipek
Period 2 Mortenson
Link to Issue

[vidhaganji]

Vidha Ganji
Period 1 Lopez
Link to Issue

[Priya0726]

Priya Suvarnagiri
Period 3 Lopez
Link to Blog