From 2f16754f9f6b766c1429375ab7417dc81cc90a63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: WilliButz Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 01:05:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: add note about commonMountOptions --- docs/src/impermanence-comparison.md | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/src/impermanence-comparison.md b/docs/src/impermanence-comparison.md index 18bb09f..533e365 100644 --- a/docs/src/impermanence-comparison.md +++ b/docs/src/impermanence-comparison.md @@ -33,3 +33,10 @@ Preservation's configuration is based on, and very similar to that of impermanen Preservation uses a global `enable` option, impermanence does not. For thoughts on the `enable` option, see the discussion at and for available configuration options see [Configuration Options](./configuration-options.md). + +### No generic `hideMounts` option + +Preservation does not provide the same `hideMounts` option as impermanence, which would set the mount option `x-gvfs-hide` for bind-mounts. +Instead, preservation allows for the configuration of arbitrary mount options that are propagated to all bind-mounts, both on the top level +of a preserved prefix, and on the per-user level. This can be done via `commonMountOptions` and would for example enable users to choose +between `x-gvfs-hide` and `x-gdu.hide`.