You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This section indicates that the prod:Relationship element would contain ONE OR MORE prod:FullProductName elements
The prod:Relationship element MUST be present with cardinality [0, ∞] in prod:Tree and if given MUST contain one or more prod:FullProductName instances. » [CSAF-5.1.3-1]
My understanding of this element is that you are creating a new FullProductName object by relating multiple other elements. This makes sense,
However, I cant figure out an example where you would define MULTIPLE FullProductName objects from that relationship.
So, from the docs, this woudl be legal.
AD Dir Services product
another AD Dir Services product
Is that the intent or is the "ONE or MORE" incorrect? and if it is correct, can you post an example of when that might be useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in version 1.2 (http://docs.oasis-open.org/csaf/csaf-cvrf/v1.2/cs01/csaf-cvrf-v1.2-cs01.html#_Toc493508771)
section 5.1.3
This section indicates that the prod:Relationship element would contain ONE OR MORE prod:FullProductName elements
My understanding of this element is that you are creating a new FullProductName object by relating multiple other elements. This makes sense,
However, I cant figure out an example where you would define MULTIPLE FullProductName objects from that relationship.
So, from the docs, this woudl be legal.
AD Dir Services product
another AD Dir Services product
Is that the intent or is the "ONE or MORE" incorrect? and if it is correct, can you post an example of when that might be useful?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: