Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vulnerabilities introduced by package lodash #704

Open
paimon0715 opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Vulnerabilities introduced by package lodash #704

paimon0715 opened this issue Jul 23, 2021 · 6 comments

Comments

@paimon0715
Copy link

paimon0715 commented Jul 23, 2021

Hi, @thomseddon @mjsalinger, there are three vulnerabilities introduced in your package oauth2-server:

Issue Description

Vulnerabilities (2 high and 1 medium severity) SNYK-JS-LODASH-590103, CVE-2021-23337 and CVE-2020-28500 are detected in package [email protected] which is directly referenced by [email protected]. We noticed that such a vulnerability has been removed since [email protected].

However, oauth2-server's popular previous version [email protected] (11,057 downloads per week) is still transitively referenced by a large amount of latest versions of active and popular downstream projects (about 138 downstream projects, e.g., ant-nodejs-kit 1.1.119, openiap 1.2.3, qms-nestjs 1.0.40, spich 6.0.1, @mobilejazz/harmony-nest 0.8.2, @jeff-tian/[email protected], etc.).
As such, issues SNYK-JS-LODASH-590103, CVE-2021-23337 and CVE-2020-28500 can be propagated into these downstream projects and expose security threats to them.

These projects cannot easily upgrade oauth2-server from version 3.1.1 to (>=4.0.0-dev.1). For instance, [email protected] is introduced into the above projects via the following package dependency paths:
(1)@jeff-tian/[email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
......

The projects such as egg-oauth2-server, which introduced [email protected], are not maintained anymore. These unmaintained packages can neither upgrade oauth2-server nor be easily migrated by the large amount of affected downstream projects.
On behalf the downstream users, could you help us remove the vulnerability from package [email protected]?

Suggested Solution

Since these inactive projects set a version constaint 3.1.* for oauth2-server on the above vulnerable dependency paths, if oauth2-server removes the vulnerabilities from 3.1.1 and releases a new patched version [email protected], such a vulnerability patch can be automatically propagated into the 138 affected downstream projects.

In [email protected], you can kindly try to perform the following upgrade(not crossing major version):
lodash 4.17.19 ➔ 4.17.21;
Note:
[email protected](>=4.17.21) has fixed the vulnerabilities (SNYK-JS-LODASH-590103, CVE-2021-23337 and CVE-2020-28500)

Thank you for your help.

Best regards,
Paimon

@mayrbenjamin92
Copy link

Do we know when this will be fixed?

@jackhollowaypersonal
Copy link

Any update guys?

@orgads
Copy link

orgads commented Oct 6, 2021

This was already fixed 4 months ago, but was not released yet.

@HappyZombies
Copy link

Hello, due to this project appearing to be dead and no maintainers responding, I went ahead and forked the project under a new organization, and will continue the work over there. https://github.com/node-oauth/node-oauth2-server

Feel free to move over there to further the discussion

@lancejpollard
Copy link

Ping? Going to use the fork for now, thank you!

@levpachmanov
Copy link

Hey @paimon0715 @lancejpollard,
We're part of a startup called Seal Security that mitigates software vulnerabilities in older open source versions by backporting/creating standalone security patches - enabling more straightforward remediation in cases like this. We created an lodash 4.17.15-sp1 that's vulnerability-free. As with all of our patches, it's open-source and available for free.
If relevant, check out our GitHub repo if you wish to learn more, or start using our app.
Please feel free to reach us at [email protected] if you have any requests/questions.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants