merge DOID:3672 'rhabdoid cancer' + DOID:3674 'kidney rhabdoid cancer'

[cmungall]

same thing?

[sbello]

Not the same thing. You can have extrarenal rhabdoid tumors. See
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/993084-overview.
Sue

On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:14 AM, Chris Mungall [email protected]
wrote:

same thing?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#38.

[cmungall]

OK, unfortunately DO bakes in the assumption that it's kidney:

 / DOID:4 ! disease
  is_a DOID:14566 ! disease of cellular proliferation
   is_a DOID:162 ! cancer
    is_a DOID:0050686 ! organ system cancer
     is_a DOID:3996 ! urinary system cancer
      is_a DOID:263 ! kidney cancer
       is_a DOID:3675 ! childhood kidney neoplasm
        is_a DOID:3672 ! rhabdoid cancer *** 
         is_a DOID:3674 ! kidney rhabdoid cancer

And the def of the parent of parent is
DOID:263 ! kidney cancer [DEF: "A urinary system cancer that is located_in the kidney."]
If this was 'in or around' it could justify the placement

I'm seeing this a lot: generic parent, specific child, but the graph forces everything that makes the child special onto the parent.