You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We need to improve/align the description elements throughout. Additional precision can avoid problems downstream.
What's particularly useful is the ability to refer to terminology in other IEC standards.
Example comment from emil:
@thclark@kersting I skimmed the "lump" and saw one thing I'd like to change, see following code
"model_name": {
"type": "string",
"title": "Model name",
"description": "Name of the turbine model (according to the manufacturer)",
Rather than "according to the manufacturer" I recommend we use "as stated on the certificate, TC, DECS, other"
Where TC = Type Certificate
DECS = Design Evaluation Conformity Statement
other could include Statement of Compliance etc.
I am pressing this point because OEMs, in my experience, sometimes use a shorthand or are inconsistent. Within my organization they like to label power to the first decimal point etc. I press everyone in my loop to use the name on the certification document. I hope we can do the same here. Originally posted by @Dash16PM in #39 (comment)
To-Do List
**For each term, we need to ensure that:
the term is in the IEC portal document
including examples either
the description is correct and consistent between portal and schema.**
document
metadata
turbine
manufacturer_name
manufacturer_display_name
model_name
model_description
platform_name
platform_description
rotor_diameter
number_of_blades
drive_type
regulation_type
rated_power
cut_in_rpm
rated_rpm
available_hub_heights
grid_frequencies
design_bases
label
name
certification
standard
standard_edition
certificate_reference
design_class
oneOf
THIS, OR
class_label
THIS
class_label
annual_average_wind_speed
annual_average_air_density
reference_wind_speed
weibull_shape_factor
vertical_shear_exponent
inflow_angle
design_lifetime
turbulence
anyOf
THIS, OR
category
THIS, OR
category
reference_turbulence_intensity
slope
THIS, OR
category
wind_speed
normal_turbulence_intensity
extreme_turbulence_intensity
THIS
category
wind_speed
normal_turbulence_intensity
normal_hours_per_lifetime
extreme_turbulence_intensity
standard_climate
operating_temperature_range
survival_temperature_range
cold_climate
operating_temperature_range
survival_temperature_range
hot_climate:
operating_temperature_range
survival_temperature_range
power_curves
default_mode
modes
label
name
design_bases
description
cuts
kind
wind_speed
period
parameters
label
dimension
values
cp_is_coefficient NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
ct_is_coefficient NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
cp NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
ct NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
acoustic_emissions
oneOf
THIS, OR
margin
weighting
wind_speed
frequency
sound_pressure_level
THIS, OR
margin
weighting
wind_speed
frequency
sound_pressure_level
THIS
margin
weighting
wind_speed
sound_pressure_level
overrides
rated_power
cut_in_rpm
rated_rpm
available_hub_heights
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thclark
changed the title
Clarify model_name parameter
Review descriptions in all parameters
Sep 26, 2023
Summary
We need to improve/align the
description
elements throughout. Additional precision can avoid problems downstream.What's particularly useful is the ability to refer to terminology in other IEC standards.
Example comment from emil:
To-Do List
**For each term, we need to ensure that:
the term is in the IEC portal document
including examples either
the description is correct and consistent between portal and schema.**
document
turbine
design_bases
class_label
power_curves
label
dimension
values
cp_is_coefficient NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
ct_is_coefficient NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
cp NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
ct NOT YET - NEEDS REFACTORING
acoustic_emissions
overrides
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: