You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been using GLIMPSE2 to impute my low-coverage samples for quality control (to proceed with subsequent association analysis). Unfortunately, I found that about 80% of the SNP mutation sites have a MAF value of 0. When I set the MAF threshold to 0.05, more than 90% of the SNP sites were eliminated. I would like to ask if this phenomenon is normal? Is it a contamination issue in my sample detection, a normal occurrence after imputation, or is there a mistake in my imputation steps?
Best
ZW Hu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have been using GLIMPSE2 to impute my low-coverage samples for quality control (to proceed with subsequent association analysis). Unfortunately, I found that about 80% of the SNP mutation sites have a MAF value of 0. When I set the MAF threshold to 0.05, more than 90% of the SNP sites were eliminated. I would like to ask if this phenomenon is normal? Is it a contamination issue in my sample detection, a normal occurrence after imputation, or is there a mistake in my imputation steps?
Best
ZW Hu
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: