-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Node fork-0 not definied #61
Comments
Thank you for your issue. Yes, there is a bug in the example. The
Do you want to perform an network optimisation or a simulation? If you check the structure of the input data of the simulation or optimisation examples respectivly, your GIS output should have the same structure as the input of the examples. In future, further functionalities should be added to directly import via |
Thank you works now! For starters, I'm interested in network optimisation, but simulation will be on the agenda as well eventually. I'll be happy to contribute! |
If you are interested in the development, you can join the next oemof dev meeting, or especially the DHNx session I just put into the wiki as topic https://github.com/oemof/oemof/wiki/Meeting-December-2020-(online) - the exact time of each session will come soon hopefully 😉 |
I tried to create my own DHN from GIS data by adding Forks, Pipes and Consumers to
ThermalNetwork()
, but it seems like the associated lat, lon is not passed to the class. Checking withis_consistent()
gives me Node fork-0 not defined even tho it's available in thermal_network.components.forks.I also tried
is_consistent()
on the example shown here https://dhnx.readthedocs.io/en/latest/examples.html and it returns Node producer-0 not defined.Is it a bug or is something missing in the tutorial?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: