Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bids: discount percentage #1706

Open
yolile opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 5 comments
Open

Bids: discount percentage #1706

yolile opened this issue Sep 13, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions Schema: Fields Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema

Comments

@yolile
Copy link
Member

yolile commented Sep 13, 2024

In Brazil, there is an award criterion called "Maior desconto" (Biggest discount) and they have a "discountPercentage" field that is used to indicate the discount percentage proposed by a supplier when the awardCriteria is “Biggest discount”.

The bids extension only allows us to disclose a bid/details/value, for this case we would need a different field for the percentage, for now, we might use bids/details/description but recording the issue in case this also exists in other jurisdictions

cc @ColinMaudry

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

jpmckinney commented Sep 13, 2024

I'm not clear on the semantics. Do they provide a (discounted) value, and then also indicate how much of a discount it is compared to their regular price?

Edit: In terms of modelling, this sounds a bit like selection criteria and requirement responses from CCCEV (and the requirements extension) – except this is instead for award criteria.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney added Schema Relating to other changes in the JSON Schema (renamed fields, schema properties, etc.) Schema: Fields Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions and removed Schema Relating to other changes in the JSON Schema (renamed fields, schema properties, etc.) labels Sep 13, 2024
@yolile
Copy link
Member Author

yolile commented Sep 13, 2024

After reading the legislation, in this type of award, the bidders must submit their bids proposing a discount based on the tender items' referential prices. I guess we could use the regular bid/details/amount field and just calculate how much the amount would be with the discount applied.

@ColinMaudry
Copy link
Member

ColinMaudry commented Sep 25, 2024

The legal source for the calculation of "maior desconto" (link):

Art 9.§2: O julgamento por maior desconto terá como referência o preço global fixado no edital de licitação ou tabela de preços praticada no mercado, e o desconto será estendido aos eventuais termos aditivos.

English: The highest discount will be based on the overall price set out in the tender notice or price list practiced in the market, and the discount will be extended to any additional terms.

Where would we indicate the tender items' referential price in OCDS data? tender.value is too broad and tender items don't have a (estimated) value field 🤔

@ColinMaudry
Copy link
Member

ColinMaudry commented Sep 25, 2024

Could we use lot.value? 💡

@yolile
Copy link
Member Author

yolile commented Sep 27, 2024

tender items don't have a (estimated) value field 🤔

tender.items.unit.value is indeed the estimated value, so we can use that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions Schema: Fields Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants