-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature: Add an FAQ for how to improve your OSCR #368
Comments
Hi, Also, I've been thinking on how to improve this score 😅 |
@FatumaA sure. Here are more details, and I'd like to expand the initial scope if that's ok. Issue Details
FAQ
5. How is the OSCR calculated?The OpenSauced Contributor Rating (OSCR) is calculated using a combination of factors that reflect a contributor's overall impact in open source. The OSCR considers contribution quality and consistency, community engagement, project impact, collaboration skills, ecosystem involvement, and reputation. These categories are evaluated over recent activity periods (90 days) to produce a comprehensive score that represents a contributor's value (out of 300 total points) to the open source community. Add a Guide to Improving Your OSCR Score
Create the OSCR Guide
Here is a list of some ways to improve your score.
I'm going to assign you the issue, but if this is too much for you to take on, let me know since the scope changed. |
That's fine. I'll get to it :) I wanted to actually come up with product docs content/architecture as well, to improve that muscle. Is there any other docs work going on in which I can take up more of an active role (after this and under your approval of course)? Perhaps the new pizza cli needs documentation help? |
@FatumaA if you think the CLI needs clearer docs, feel free to raise an issue. One thing I've been thinking about but haven't gotten to is doing a bit of a reorg for docs. We have some Concepts at OpenSauced that I think are valuable but are getting lost in the other docs. I would like to see a section for that. It should include things like:
It doesn't need to be as thorough as Understanding Repo Insights Data, but this is a decent enough example to show that with the section, users can 1. Understand what those concepts mean and 2. Understand why they're useful. It should go a little deeper than the glossary. Maybe be linked in the glossary, even. Let me know if you're interested in taking that on or if you would prefer to do that over this issue. |
Hi, Oh, and by the way, is there some kind of style/writing guide? Things like, are we talking to contributors or orgs behind the repos? Are we using US or UK English? Are we using I/You or We? and the like? |
Hey @FatumaA,
I hope this helps. Feel free to ask if you have more questions! ✨ |
Thank you Ayu! |
Suggested solution
This should talk about how it's a holistic score and how there's no one way to improve it. Things to take into consideration include:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: