First schema suggestions for specific data types to be added in core #523
Labels
major update
large workload or major update needed to complete
request
any request or update for schemas
This was started in the openMINDS_neuroimaging extension, but @lzehl and I would like to suggest to move them to core. The main reason is that any research product could profit from using them as (sort of) extensions to their associated files to provide more details about the data. It would be cumbersome to have to use multiple openMINDS extensions to find suitable data type schemas, the list of data types is not as extensive as e.g., devices where we concluded that we collect them in the most suitable openMINDS extension repos instead and it would also allow us to link to these specific data types as the data for specific schemas like e.g., coordinate frameworks in the upcoming SANDS update. The latter would be important in cases where the specific files may not be easy to share, but to still provide some metadata. This logic may also apply to other extensions as well, but should be discussed in a developers meeting.
I have made a draft for some data types based on the draft for some of the data types that @Peyman-N has prepared in the neuroimaging extension. This draft includes the types needed to cover any kind of files used as reference data for atlases.
RasterGraphic
VectorGraphic
ImageStack
NOTE: This is defined as 'A group of images with a similar frame of reference.' and include captured stacks (like z-stacks), reconstructed stacks from single image captures and images that could be reconstructed into a stack because they have a similar frame of reference (like 2D atlas reference data - data has same coordinate space and typically are single captures from the same brain at different spatial locations).
QUESTION: When does a ImageStack become a Volume?
Volume
3DMesh (one surface type)
NOTE: I know we need this somehow, but I'm not sure how to solve it since I don't really know this data type.
This is a rather long issue. @lzehl if this seems like a reasonable start point I can make this into a PR for easier review of each property. @openMetadataInitiative/openminds-admins and @openMetadataInitiative/openminds-developers, any feedback?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: